![]() ![]() There are several mastering packages of plugins available for PT now as well from people like Waves, from Bias (Peak Pro people), Izotope, Massey, etc. However, it is expensive: starting at $495 and the full package is somewhere around $1000 or so with all the restoration and mastering plugins. Audio Mastering free download also includes 5 hours on-demand video, 4 articles. I've heard the most recent versions are very good, but haven't used it myself. The other option would be of course Peak Pro. Toast Titanium is only about $80 now, too. It should include Arrange Tracks, Pause, IdMarks, crossfade, peak control &Plugins for Mastering. It does pretty much the same things as Waveburner although maybe not with as nice an interface. Does anyone know an alternative Cd-finalzer Programm (refering to wavelab or Waveburner) the ones just for OS X and the other is a bit expensive i think. It does all the spacing and crossfades it can now dither 24-bit files, use AU plugins, add ISRC codes, whatever you need for full red book specs and final tweaking. I pretty much do what Bob does: use Toast Titanium. If there are no changes, it should simply burn the file as-is, not bounce it again, but there's no option to use the existing bounce file for burning. I don't like that even if you make no changes to plugins or settings, you have to re-render the file every time you want to burn it. The other really nice thing about WBPro is that is supports VST plug-ins and comes with six native plug-ins for mastering: Compressor, five band parametric EQ, Denoiser, multi-band (up to four) compressor, stereo base expander and limiter. It costs $495 (but then, you do get Logic Studio with it)Ģ. Dithering from 24 to 16 bits is done with the POWr algorithm, the main competitor to Apogee's UV22. You start trying other software and your mind is blown because it can't do certain things that Reaper can do.1. ![]() With Reaper - the relationship is such that the more you get to know it, the harder it is to ever leave it. Indentation shows you what-is-in-what, and when you throw an effect on a track folder it applies to everything inside. It makes routing incredibly easy, and you can see visually what's going on. This CD mastering and authoring tool is simple enough for you to quickly turn out demo discs, and powerful enough for you to deliver professional premasters, Red Book-standard CDs, and Disc. I would have assumed every DAW does that but it doesn't. But that's part of what makes the software so incredibly stable so I am forgiving.Īnother thing I love is its track folders function as busses. The UI when mixing & tracking looks great but the stock plugins and other menus are very "standard" or "programmer art" looking. What are the shortcomings? Mainly visual / experiential. Everyone has different processes and Reaper's customization means you can make the workflow fit your needs. Having looked at the basic operation of Waveburner last month, I thought it would be useful to follow up with some information on how to take your project from raw audio files to Red Book-standard CD. "Customization" isn't just about visuals - it's about workflow. This month we discuss in-depth features in Waveburner and look at some of the included plug-ins that can be used to polish up a mastering project. There's also user scripts for even more specifics. Zwar bietet auch Waveburner (OS-X) eine DDP-Image-Export-Funktion, ist aber in diesem Punkt fehleranfällig. There is an SWS script library that is like a giant swiss army knife, and that's just the official set. Sequoia (Windows) oder Wavelab 7.x (OS-X und Windows) kann man fertig gemasterte CD-Projekte als DDP-Image exportieren und fast genauso wichtig auch DDP-Images importieren. Watertight code leads to incredible stability and it seems to run more plugins before getting bogged down. I can tell you why I prefer Reaper, myself: This is certainly a subjective question, and you'd have to REALLY define your question if you want an objective answer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |